Guys, who's ass do we have to kick to get the following removed from the FOAF spec?
Status: unstable
Status: testing
Status: unstable
Status: testing
posted by:
|
Toronto
|
-
Re: Who's Ass?
Wed, November 17, 2004 - 7:37 AMThat'll be mine ;)
We try to be careful about saying stuff is stable prematurely. Implementation reports are important... if you think bits of the spec are good enough to be baked, drop mail to rdfweb-dev@vapours.rdfweb.org (the FOAF list) and I'll add it to agenda for the next IRC meeting.
There are a number of terms in FOAF that are solid enough to get frozen I think. One thing that held us back was wanting to have some guidelines for moving things forward, ie. what counts as stable.
rdfweb.org/topic/FOAFCommunityProcess
...is some work towards that end. Comments welcome (ideally in the wiki but here OK too).
cheers,
danbri@foaf-project.org -
-
Re: Who's Ass?
Wed, November 17, 2004 - 7:51 AMHey Dan,
I'm looking to add FOAF to my generalized XML validator.
www.kbcafe.com/rss/
It's in there right now, but not well.
I'd love to see some more concrete.
Thanks and I love FOAF,
Randy
-
